Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Titanium | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1389.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s global score of 85.2. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a incredibly newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), although it is extremely heavier and thicker. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite better pixels quantity per inch of screen, a little bit larger screen and a higher 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 896 GB more internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations, higher video frame rates, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.