Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is slightly better than the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's 92.1 overall score. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body has the same thickness than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but it's just a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has Android 14.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 16 GB more RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better display than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a bit worse pixels number per screen inch, and they both have a display with the same size, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also counts with a much brighter screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a much smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 1 TB internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 5600mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.