Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it is way heavier. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better looking screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit worse 1280 x 2800 resolution and a bit worse pixels amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a really brighter display.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a superior processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a lot better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 992 GB more internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5600mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.