Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | -- |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a score of 92.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's construction is much newer, a little bit lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a really larger display. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a way bigger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design costs more than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.