Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's 87.9 global score. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a just a bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10, giving some additional features.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a much brighter screen, a quite better 1280 x 2800 resolution and a little greater screen density.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality and a much smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 896 GB more internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 19% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.