Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a 92.1 score against 81.6. Even though the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's just a little bit thinner and also much newer. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a really brighter display, a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the display, a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1280 x 2800. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 960 GB more internal storage capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger amount of RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a lot bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 5160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.