Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is a lot better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's overall score of 76.6. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design body is way newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has older 14 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with an incredibly better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a higher 1280 x 2800px resolution, a just a little better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little bigger display.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a more MP back camera, a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a really longer battery life than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.