Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is much better than the Google Pixel, with a general score of 92.1 against 80.2. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition's construction is notably newer than Google Pixel's, but it is a little thicker and a lot heavier. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a greater performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has an incredibly better display than Google Pixel, because it has a better 1280 x 2800px resolution, a little higher number of pixels per screen inch and a lot larger display. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has a much larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a lot larger sensor and better video frame rate.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 896 GB more internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 102 percent greater battery size.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.