Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-22 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is better than Google Pixel 3a, having a score of 92.1 against 78.8. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a way newer phone than the Google Pixel 3a, but it's a little thicker and heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has 14 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a better performing CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has 20 GB more RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution, a little bit higher pixel count per inch of screen and a bigger screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition takes way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs, a lot higher resolution camera and a much larger aperture.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5600mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.