Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | -- |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 92.1 against 80.1. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition construction is notably newer, notably thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones use Android operating system, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has the older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit worse pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1280 x 2800, it also counts with a much bigger display. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.