Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black |
| Glass and Titanium | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is much better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a 92.1 score against 81. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a newer 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a little bit heavier than the Galaxy XCover Pro, it's thinner and extremely newer.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution, a quite larger screen and a little more pixels per display inch. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has more RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a way better (4K) video quality, a larger aperture, a much higher resolution camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.