Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-08-09 | 2019-03-08 |
| 7.04 x 3.58 x 0.28 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 420.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 445 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 955 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than Honor Note 8, having an 86.3 score against 65.5. Galaxy S10e is a much newer and much lighter phone than Honor Note 8, although it's just a little thicker. The Honor Note 8 and the Galaxy S10e both count with similar displays, although the Galaxy S10e has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, a bit smaller screen and a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S10e has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Honor Note 8, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better hardware performance than Honor Note 8, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e captures way better photographs and videos than Honor Note 8, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Honor Note 8 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45% bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10e is also the cheapest, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.