Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-01-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Honor View20's 73.2 general score. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is newer than Honor View20, it's just a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Honor View20 counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better display than Honor View20, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor View20, because it has 256 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery performance than Honor View20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Honor View20, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger camera aperture, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a back facing camera with a higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.