Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-01-22 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is better than Honor View20, having a global score of 80.8 against 73.2. The Nokia XR20 body is way newer, but way heavier and much thicker than the Honor View20. Honor View20 has a little faster processor than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor View20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia XR20 features a slightly better looking screen than Honor View20, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Honor View20 has a slightly better camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution and the same aperture, the Honor View20 also has a much better video resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Honor View20, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. Nokia XR20 has a bit better battery lifetime than Honor View20, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.