Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-01-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the Honor View20's 73.2 general score. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is extremely newer than the Honor View20's, but it is just a little thicker and a little bit heavier. The Honor View20 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Honor View20 and Galaxy A52 5G both have really similar screens, although the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bit bigger screen, a little bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bigger storage for applications and games than Honor View20, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better battery life than Honor View20, because it has a 13% bigger battery size. The Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better camera than Honor View20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.