Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-01-22 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 398 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is better than the Honor View20, having a overall score of 85 against 73.2. Even when Samsung Galaxy M40 and Honor View20 were only released 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy M40 is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Galaxy M40 and Honor View20 both have similar screens, because although the Galaxy M40 has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Honor View20 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor View20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy M40 has a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Honor View20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Honor View20 takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor View20 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Honor View20 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.