Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-01-22 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than Honor View20, having an 80.4 score against 73.2. Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older than the Honor View20, it's body is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. The Honor View20 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better looking screen than Honor View20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Honor View20 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor View20 also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Honor View20 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Honor View20 counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.