Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-01-22 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Honor View20's general score of 73.2. Although the Galaxy Note3 is a lot older and a little bit thicker than Honor View20, it's construction is still a bit lighter. The Honor View20 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Honor View20 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2310 pixels and a bit bigger display. The Honor View20 captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor View20 also has a much larger camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Honor View20 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Honor View20 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.