Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-01-22 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is a little bit better than the Honor View20, having a global score of 75.8 against 73.2. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy S7 Active's design is notably older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Honor View20. The Honor View20 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper display than Honor View20, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better display pixel density. Honor View20 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Honor View20 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor View20 also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy S7 Active and Honor View20 have really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.