Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-01-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Honor View20's general score of 73.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the Honor View20, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a screen that's just as good as Honor View20's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better processing power than Honor View20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Honor View20 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, the Honor View20 also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Honor View20 one, they have equal internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better battery lifetime than Honor View20, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.