Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has an overall score of 81.1, which is slightly better than Honor View30 Pro's overall score of 74.6. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10. The Google Nexus 6 body is lighter than Honor View30 Pro, but it is thicker and was released many years before.
The Google Nexus 6 has a much better looking display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Honor View30 Pro counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal memory.
The Honor View30 Pro features just a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM. Honor View30 Pro counts with better battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 27% larger battery size.
Honor View30 Pro has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor View30 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way higher 40 MP resolution and a bigger aperture to take better images in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.