Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than Honor View30 Pro, with an 80.2 score against 74.6. The Google Pixel design is way lighter and a little bit thinner than Honor View30 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Honor View30 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Google Pixel counts with a bit better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Google Pixel features as much memory to install games and applications as Honor View30 Pro, both have the same internal storage.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh. The Honor View30 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor View30 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.