Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting an 82.5 score against 74.6. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an much older device than Honor View30 Pro, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Honor View30 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a slightly better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with as much storage capacity to install games and applications as the Honor View30 Pro one, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Honor View30 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor View30 Pro also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.