Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is just a bit better than Honor View30 Pro's general score of 74.6. Although Google Pixel 3 is older than Honor View30 Pro, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Honor View30 Pro has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. Honor View30 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor View30 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Honor View30 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor, a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Honor View30 Pro features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.