Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, having a global score of 80.7 against 74.6. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Honor View30 Pro, it's construction is thinner and lighter. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Honor View30 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Honor View30 Pro has better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity. Honor View30 Pro has a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations, a way better 40 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.