Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than Honor View30 Pro, getting a global score of 78.8 against 74.6. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features. Google Pixel 3a's design is a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Honor View30 Pro, even when both of them were released with only 7 months difference.
Honor View30 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor View30 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3a has a little more vivid display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Honor View30 Pro has much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage. Honor View30 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Honor View30 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor View30 Pro also has a lot better 40 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.