Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is a little bit better than Honor View30 Pro, getting a general score of 78.9 against 74.6. Even though the Google Pixel 3a XL and the Honor View30 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 3a XL is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Honor View30 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Honor View30 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Honor View30 Pro features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger aperture, a camera in the back with a lot better 40 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor.
The Honor View30 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.