Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 global score. Google Pixel 4 is a just a little thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than the Honor View30 Pro, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better looking display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4's processor is very similar to the CPU in Honor View30 Pro, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Honor View30 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory.
Honor View30 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos, a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.