Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting a global score of 82.9 against 74.6. Google Pixel 4a's design is a little bit thinner and way lighter than the Honor View30 Pro, even though both of them were released with only 9 months difference. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, providing a lot of extra features.
The Honor View30 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit sharper display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4a and Honor View30 Pro have very similar storage for games and applications, they have the same internal memory. The Honor View30 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor View30 Pro also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Honor View30 Pro has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.