Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than the Honor View30 Pro's score of 74.6. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is newer, lighter and just a little thinner than the Honor View30 Pro.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little higher pixels amount per inch of screen.
The Honor View30 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments and a back camera with a much better 40 megapixels resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G's memory capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to the Honor View30 Pro one, both of them have the same internal storage. Honor View30 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.