Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than Honor View30 Pro's general score of 74.6. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10. HTC One M9's design is noticeably lighter than Honor View30 Pro, although it is just a little bit thicker and was released 5 years before.
HTC One M9 features a bit superior processing unit than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and an additional GPU. The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little higher pixel density.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Honor View30 Pro features a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor View30 Pro also has a lot bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video, a camera with a much higher resolution and a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.