Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting a overall score of 85.4 against 74.6. LG K92 is a newer phone, and it's also a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Honor View30 Pro. Both phones in this review include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
Honor View30 Pro has a bit superior processor than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Honor View30 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
The LG K92 counts with just a bit better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a 0.5 inches sensor, the LG K92 also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
The LG K92 has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Honor View30 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.