Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-11-26 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is much better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 overall score. The LG V30S ThinQ body is much lighter and somewhat thinner than Honor View30 Pro, although it was released just a little more than a year before. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10.
Honor View30 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Honor View30 Pro captures better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.6 aperture, the Honor View30 Pro also has a way more MP back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.