Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an overall score of 83.1, which is much better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 overall score. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a much newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than the Honor View30 Pro. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has 12 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version.
Honor View30 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Honor View30 Pro and Motorola Edge 30 Neo have quite similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density.
The Honor View30 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo's memory capacity for applications and games is very similar to Honor View30 Pro's one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Honor View30 Pro has a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.