Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Honor View30 Pro's overall score of 74.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a extremely newer phone, and it is also a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Honor View30 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel count per inch of display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bit larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
The Honor View30 Pro has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, faster video frame rate and a camera with a higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little better battery lifetime than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.