Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-11-26 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is slightly better than Honor View30 Pro, with a global score of 75.8 against 74.6. Moto Z Force is an way older cellphone than Honor View30 Pro, but it's somewhat thinner and extremely lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user lots of additional features.
Honor View30 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM. Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Moto Z Force has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Honor View30 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better images in low-light environments and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Honor View30 Pro features improved battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.