Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Honor View30 Pro's score of 74.6. Despite of the fact that Moto Z Force Droid Edition is incredibly older than Honor View30 Pro, it's design is extremely lighter and thinner. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little bit better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Honor View30 Pro features a bit better CPU than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). Honor View30 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor View30 Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a larger camera aperture.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Honor View30 Pro has greater battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 17% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.