Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than Honor View30 Pro, getting a 79.8 score against 74.6. The Motorola One Hyper design has the same thickness than the Honor View30 Pro, but it's a little lighter. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
Honor View30 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a quite better count of pixels in each inch of screen, a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Honor View30 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Hyper has a superior memory for applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has a camera that's just as good as Honor View30 Pro's camera, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.