Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 399 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than Honor View30 Pro, with a score of 79.2 against 74.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is incredibly newer, just a little lighter and much thinner than the Honor View30 Pro.
The Honor View30 Pro has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Honor View30 Pro features a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a little longer battery lifetime than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 15% bigger battery size. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos in low light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.