Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting an 81.3 score against 74.6. The Galaxy A31 is a a little thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Honor View30 Pro, even when both were released only 5 months apart. Both devices we are comparing use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Honor View30 Pro features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A31 and Honor View30 Pro both have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy A31 has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per screen inch.
Galaxy A31 features more memory to install applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Honor View30 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a camera with a lower 40 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has greater battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.