Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, with a 79.4 score against 74.6. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10. Even though Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit heavier than Honor View30 Pro, it's a little bit thinner and newer.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a bit sharper display than Honor View30 Pro, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit worse pixels amount in each inch of screen, they both have a same size screen. Honor View30 Pro features a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Honor View30 Pro and Galaxy A35 5G both count with really similar cameras, because although the Galaxy A35 5G has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Honor View30 Pro and Galaxy A35 5G both have incredibly similar storage to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A35 5G counts with superior battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.