Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than the Honor View30 Pro, having a score of 83.8 against 74.6. The Galaxy A50 body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Honor View30 Pro, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Galaxy A50 has a display that is very similar to the Honor View30 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A50 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Honor View30 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back, a way larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, a larger camera aperture and a much better (4K) video definition. Honor View30 Pro has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.