Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 score. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Honor View30 Pro, even when both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Honor View30 Pro count with really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per inch in the display. Honor View30 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a slightly better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has much more storage to store more apps and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little better battery life than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.