Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is way better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 overall score. Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it is also a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Honor View30 Pro. Honor View30 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor View30 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 and Honor View30 Pro have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52 has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little higher display density. The Galaxy A52 has a bit better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 features a much better storage for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features a bit longer battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.