Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the Honor View30 Pro's overall score of 74.6. These devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Honor View30 Pro.
Galaxy A52 5G has a display that's just as good as the Honor View30 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity per inch of screen. Honor View30 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.