Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Honor View30 Pro, with a overall score of 91.1 against 74.6. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is newer, a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Honor View30 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a display that's just as good as Honor View30 Pro's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. The Honor View30 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A52s captures a bit better videos and photos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A52s has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit longer battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.