Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Honor View30 Pro, getting a overall score of 76.9 against 74.6. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. The Galaxy A70 construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Honor View30 Pro, although both were released with only a few months difference.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Honor View30 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Honor View30 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor View30 Pro also has a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.