Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than the Honor View30 Pro's global score of 74.6. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Even though Galaxy Fold and the Honor View30 Pro were released only 2 months apart, Galaxy Fold's body is a lot thinner but a lot heavier.
Honor View30 Pro features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixels density. Galaxy Fold features a bit superior CPU than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Honor View30 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.