Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Honor View30 Pro, having a general score of 98.9 against 74.6. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features and increased performance. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Honor View30 Pro were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a bit thinner but also a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a bit larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot better resolution back camera, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.