Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Honor View30 Pro, with a score of 79.3 against 74.6. Galaxy Note 5 is an noticeably older cellphone than the Honor View30 Pro, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10.
The Honor View30 Pro has a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater display pixel density.
The Honor View30 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Honor View30 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Honor View30 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.